NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 7, 8, 8(1), 8(2), 9 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016, RULE 5, 5(2), 6 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (APPLICATION TO ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY) RULES, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

NAME

MOBILE NO.

E-MAIL I’D

RANJEET KUMAR

83830984789667769795

rk@courtkutchehry.com

JAI THAKUR

81307033349355723300

jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com

RAJEEV RANJAN

9334553249

rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com

ASHOK MISHRA

9718327746

sales@courtkutchehry.com

RAVI KUMAR


ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

Jyoti Strips Private Limited Vs. JSC Ispat Private Limited, (2020) 06 NCLT CK 0046

NCLT dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner, under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for brevity 'code') read with Rules 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority), 2016 (for brevity 'the Rules') with a prayer to initiate the Corporate Insolvency process against the Corporate Debtor. While dismissing the petition NCLT held that when we shall consider the case of the applicant, then We are of the considered view that under Rule 5 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, there are two modes for sending demand notice, one is, either at the registered office by hand, registered post or speed post with acknowledgement due, or second one, by electronic mail service to a whole time director or designated partner or key managerial personnel, if any, of the corporate debtor, and on the basis of the facts stated in the application, we find, as per rule 5(2) of the insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, the applicant had to send the demand notice either by hand, through registered post or speed post with acknowledgement due at the registered office of the Corporate Debtor or by electronic mail service to a whole time director, designated partner or key managerial personnel of the corporate debtor, and on the basis of the facts stated in the application, we find, the applicant had sent the demand notice through the speed post, as well as though courier service but both have which returned as "Addressee left without instructions". Also, the applicant has sent the demand notice through electronic mail but the Operational Creditor has nowhere mentioned in the application, whether it is sent on the email id of the whole time director, designated partner or key managerial personnel of the corporate debtor. Therefore, it can be said that the applicant has not delivered notice under Section 8 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, in accordance with the provision of Rule 5 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rule, 2016.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 3(11), 3(12), 5(21), 7, 8(1), 8(2), 9 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016

NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 5(7), 5(8), 7, 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 7(5), 7(5)(A), 7(7), 8, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 31(1), 33 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016, RULE 4, 4(3), 6 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (APPLICATION TO ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY) RULES, 2016, SECTION 13(2), 17 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 AND SECTION 433(E) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956